Sanctions · PEP · Business risk

Manage your AML checks in one clear workflow

VeroFlag helps teams check people and companies, review potential matches, record decisions, attach evidence, and monitor changes over time.

  • Sources refreshed daily
  • Built for API and agent workflows
Sanctions check
Michael Smith
In review
Subject type
Individual · v3
Case
VFL688136
3 matches found

Name, Alias, DOB + 2 country matches

OFAC SDN · SI, GB · b. 1984

96%
Monitoring on
saved 09:14 UTC
Official sources

Every check runs against the lists that matter, and records which source snapshot it used.

List data aggregated and de-duplicated via OpenSanctions; the exact source snapshot is recorded on every check.

OFAC SDN
US Treasury
UK Sanctions List
HM Treasury / OFSI
EU Consolidated
European Union
UN Consolidated
Security Council
A complete solution

Built around the work reviewers actually do

The platform is designed for the daily review loop: checks, evidence, decisions, ownership, and follow-up.

Sanctions, PEP, and business-risk checks

Run the checks your review needs without splitting evidence across separate tools or spreadsheets.

Clear match review

See why a candidate appeared, which source it came from, and what reviewer outcome was recorded.

Case references

Attach notes, links, and files to the case or to a specific check so supporting evidence stays visible.

Subject profile versions

Keep each case tied to the subject details used at the time, with profile history available for later review.

Activity timeline

System events, reviewer comments, references, and decision changes sit in one chronological record.

Team workflow

Use owners, collaborators, groups, and case status to keep review work moving without losing accountability.

SIMPLE, EFFICIENT WORKFLOW

One workflow from check to decision

VeroFlag keeps the review path visible: what was checked, what matched, what evidence was added, and what decision was made.

1

Create the case

Start with a person or company subject, then choose the checks that fit the review.

2

Review the matches

Open each candidate match with the source, score, aliases, country signals, and identifiers in view.

3

Record the outcome

Save match status, final decision, decision reason, references, and the review timeline together.

4

Monitor changes

Keep important subjects under monitoring and return to the case when new source data changes the risk picture.

Start with a 10-day Pro trial.

Create a workspace, run real checks, review matches, and keep the decision trail in one place. Trial workspaces use Pro limits, so your team can test the workflow properly before choosing a plan.

1,000

checks a month on the Pro trial limit

100

monitored subjects tracked for source-data changes

20

seats, so the reviewers who need to test it can